|
Political Factoid
The Boeing 737 MAX Airplane
and what we think we know so far: *
W-O-R-K-I-N-G D-R-A-F-T
Background/history
- Historical airplane design principles
- Safety first cf.
H146
- Redundancy
- Default stability of airframe in flight
| cf. |
Safety-bicycle type design policy Hands off and it tends to go straight |
- Trends over the years:
- Mechanical controls replaced by hydraulic controls
- Hydraulic controls replaced by electrical controls (a.k.a. fly-by-wire)
- Hardware controls replaced by software controls
- Aircraft certification process bootstraps from previous models
(a.k.a. cost saving short cuts)
| cf. |
Like taking an old house, tearing it down to
its foundation, and building a new, larger house
--- saving on costs of zoning, permitting, and other
applications, approvals, and inspections
|
- Coziness between Boeing and FAA
(typical of any industry-government arrangement)
Enter the MAX model
- New larger, heavier engines for greater speed, range, fuel efficiency
creating a shift in the center of gravity
and producing a significantly increased risk
- Tendency to nose up on take off into a stall
- Automatic software compensation added to drive nose down
- Software triggered by single sensor (and single-point of failure)
Straying off the path of proper design
- Inadequate testing for the new risk modes
(Test to show it works, but no tests to show when it fails)
| cf. |
Push No.1 button and the green light comes on Push No.2 button and the red light comes on
-- all per the specifications
but what happens if both buttons No.1 and
No.2 get pushed at the same time?
|
- Additional pilot training not required/provided
(That would cost money, take time, and make the airplane
less attractive in the marketplace.)
- No information about the new system in the airplane manual
(See No.5b above)
- Incidents have been encountered, some reported, but not acted upon.
- Problems identified by the Lion Air crash
- Boeing sets out to revise software
- Second 737 Max crash occurs in Ethiopia
Denial and Potential Coverup by Boeing and the FAA
(If we deny the problem, it won't be one) cf. 10022
- Boeing continued to claim airplanes to be safe
- FAA echoed what Boeing said (See No.4 above)
- Position of FAA Director vacant in Trump Administration
- No replacement nominated by President Trump (budget cut?)
- FAA falls under Department of Transportation
- Sec. of Transportation is wife of obstructionist Mitch McConnell ('nuf said?)
- Fmr. Boeing exec is now Trump's acting Sec. of Defense (DOD)
- Airlines and governments around the world started to ground
the 737 MAX out of safety-first caution
- Boeing CEO went to Mar-a-Lago and talked with President Trump
- Boeing and Trump had subsequent phone calls.
- Trump, FAA, and Boeing continued to claim the airplane is safe.
America Last
- Many airlines grounded their own 737 MAX airplanes (See No.1a above)
- China grounded 737 MAX airplanes
- Europe grounded 737 MAX airplanes
- Australia grounded 737 MAX airplanes
- Canada grounded 737 MAX airplanes
- The 737 MAX was no longer allowed to fly in or over
any country other than the U.S. (2019-Mar-13)
- Finally, someone at the FAA issued an order grounding
737 MAX airplanes in the US (2019-Mar-13)
| Victory declared
|
cf. |
20726
|
- Immediately, President Donald Trump claimed credit
for the grounding "to error on the side of safety" (2019-Mar-13)
| * |
Be careful about drawing conclusions
from what you think you know.
|
cf. |
10408
|
|
|
-30-
|